1) The Daoist school in question is a Western invention and has no historical or cultural roots in China.
2) The Daoist school in question does not exist in Russia and is not ‘Russian’.
3) The Daoist school in question possesses no Chinese Masters or authentic Chinese Daoist knowledge.
4) The Daoist school in question only controls the English-language Wikipedia pages regarding Daoism – and does not write any pages for the Russian Wikipedia,
5) The Daoist school in question exists only to make money and is not ‘Chinese’ in any way.
The report goes on for ten pages and says in one part that the Daoist school in question was contacted by a Russian speaker on the telephone and those who answered a) could not speak Russian, and b) spoke English with an ‘American’ accent. The final page of the report from the Daoist Association of China states that the Qianfeng School of Beijing – under the control of Zhao Ming Wang – is the ONLY legitimate inheritor of the Wu Liu School of Daoism in China today. Those who truly cultivate the Dao under authentic teachers in the East or West should avoid commercial entities that behave in an un-Daoist manner and that spreads lies and disinformation.